DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Freelander vs 2012 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAudi
FreelanderModelTT
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
190 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
190 HPPower170 HP
420 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4198 mm
—Width1842 mm
1740 mmHeight1353 mm
1805 KgWeight1405 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Freelander and 2012 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…