DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
ASXModelTT
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
200 km/hTop speed226 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
300 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4198 mm
1770 mmWidth1842 mm
1625 mmHeight1353 mm
1460 KgWeight1405 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…