DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi TT vs 2012 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeLand Rover
TTModelFreelander
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
226 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
170 HPPower190 HP
350 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4198 mmLength4500 mm
1842 mmWidth—
1353 mmHeight1740 mm
1405 KgWeight1805 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi TT and 2012 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…