DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
OmegaModelEclipse
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
243 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
211 HPPower213 HP
270 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4455 mm
1776 mmWidth1750 mm
1455 mmHeight1341 mm
1605 KgWeight1525 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…