DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeOpel
LSModelOmega
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
190 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
190 HPPower211 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
12 ltUrban consumption15,5 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4898 mm
1860 mmWidth1776 mm
1425 mmHeight1455 mm
1665 KgWeight1605 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…