DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Opel Omega vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelOmega
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
243 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
211 HPPower211 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption15,5 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4898 mm
1785 mmWidth1776 mm
1450 mmHeight1455 mm
1605 KgWeight1605 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Opel Omega and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…