DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
ChallengerModelOmega
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
170 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
185 HPPower211 HP
265 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank75 lt
16 ltUrban consumption15,5 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4898 mm
1775 mmWidth1776 mm
1730 mmHeight1455 mm
1830 KgWeight1605 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…