2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 3.0i V6 (211 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Lincoln
LS
Lincoln LS 3.0 V6 24V (190 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Lincoln LS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationLincoln LS
OpelMakeLincoln
OmegaModelLS
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationLincoln LS
8,5 s0–100 km/h—
243 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
211 HPPower190 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationLincoln LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationLincoln LS
4898 mmLength4925 mm
1776 mmWidth1860 mm
1455 mmHeight1425 mm
1605 KgWeight1665 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2908 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…