2013 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (195 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.75/100
2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Audi Q3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Audi
Q3
Audi Q3 2.0 TFSI (170 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Opel Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi Q3
OpelMakeAudi
CascadaModelQ3
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeCrossover
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi Q3
9,4 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
230 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
195 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi Q3
DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi Q3
4696 mmLength4385 mm
1839 mmWidth1831 mm
1443 mmHeight1608 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1585 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2603 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…