DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Audi A3 vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationOpel Cascada
AudiMakeOpel
A3ModelCascada
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationOpel Cascada
7,1 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
232 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
180 HPPower195 HP
250 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationOpel Cascada
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationOpel Cascada
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationOpel Cascada
4237 mmLength4696 mm
1777 mmWidth1839 mm
1421 mmHeight1443 mm
1230 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Audi A3 and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…