2013 • Audi
Q3
Audi Q3 2.0 TFSI (170 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.5/100
2013 Audi Q3 vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (195 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Opel Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi Q3SpecificationOpel Cascada
AudiMakeOpel
Q3ModelCascada
2013Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Audi Q3SpecificationOpel Cascada
8,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
212 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
170 HPPower195 HP
280 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi Q3SpecificationOpel Cascada
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank56 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi Q3SpecificationOpel Cascada
4385 mmLength4696 mm
1831 mmWidth1839 mm
1608 mmHeight1443 mm
1585 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2695 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Audi Q3 and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…