DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 BMW Z4 vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationOpel Cascada
BMWMakeOpel
Z4ModelCascada
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationOpel Cascada
6,9 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
235 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
184 HPPower195 HP
270 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationOpel Cascada
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationOpel Cascada
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17 WTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationOpel Cascada
4239 mmLength4696 mm
1790 mmWidth1839 mm
1291 mmHeight1443 mm
1470 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2496 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 BMW Z4 and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…