DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi A3
OpelMakeAudi
CascadaModelA3
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi A3
9,4 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
230 km/hTop speed232 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
195 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CascadaSpecificationAudi A3
4696 mmLength4237 mm
1839 mmWidth1777 mm
1443 mmHeight1421 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1230 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…