1999 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (255 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
1999 Nissan Cima vs 2000 BMW X5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • BMW
X5
BMW X5 3.0i (231 Hp) 2000Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
BMW X5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
NissanMakeBMW
CimaModelX5
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
—0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
255 HPPower231 HP
343 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank92 lt
—Urban consumption17,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption12,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/65 R15 HTyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
4945 mmLength4666 mm
1780 mmWidth1872 mm
1435 mmHeight1717 mm
1660 KgWeight1990 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2820 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Cima and 2000 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW X5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…