2000 • BMW
X5
BMW X5 3.0i (231 Hp) 2000Overall Score75.75/100
2000 BMW X5 vs 1999 Nissan Cima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (255 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
WINNER
BMW X5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
BMWMakeNissan
X5ModelCima
2000Model year1999
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
8,3 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
231 HPPower255 HP
300 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
92 ltFuel tank80 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,7 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/65 R17Tyre size215/65 R15 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
4666 mmLength4945 mm
1872 mmWidth1780 mm
1717 mmHeight1435 mm
1990 KgWeight1660 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 BMW X5 and 1999 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW X5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…