DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Cima vs 1999 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
CimaModelCima
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
255 HPPower255 HP
343 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/65 R15 HTyre size215/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4945 mmLength4945 mm
1780 mmWidth1780 mm
1435 mmHeight1435 mm
1660 KgWeight1660 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Cima and 1999 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…