DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 1999 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

74.5–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeNissan
LSModelCima
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
223 HPPower255 HP
292 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size215/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4945 mm
1860 mmWidth1780 mm
1450 mmHeight1435 mm
1630 KgWeight1660 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 1999 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…