DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Daewoo Korando Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

50.25–49.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeDaewoo
CedricModelKorando
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

16,8 s0–100 km/h19,8 s
163 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2825 ccEngine displacement2874 cc
100 HPPower129 HP
178 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
195/70 R14Tyre size235/75R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4330 mm
1690 mmWidth1841 mm
1425 mmHeight1840 mm
1510 KgWeight1815 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Daewoo Korando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…