2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.5 DTI (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score49.5/100
2000 Opel Campo vs 2000 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.8d (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
49.5–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationNissan Cedric
OpelMakeNissan
CampoModelCedric
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationNissan Cedric
18,3 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
140 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
226 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationNissan Cedric
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CampoSpecificationNissan Cedric
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size195/70 R14
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationNissan Cedric
4980 mmLength4690 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1710 mmHeight1425 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Campo and 2000 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…