DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Korando vs 2000 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.5–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeNissan
KorandoModelCedric
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
140 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
129 HPPower100 HP
260 NmTorque178 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/75R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4330 mmLength4690 mm
1841 mmWidth1690 mm
1840 mmHeight1425 mm
1815 KgWeight1510 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Korando and 2000 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…