DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
CedricModelCedric
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

16,8 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
163 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2825 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
178 NmTorque178 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/70 R14Tyre size195/70 R14

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4690 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1425 mmHeight1425 mm
1510 KgWeight1510 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…