1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5i (235 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
1999 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 2.5 i (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Capella
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationMazda Capella
NissanMakeMazda
CedricModelCapella
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationMazda Capella
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
209 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
235 HPPower200 HP
274 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationMazda Capella
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
205/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationMazda Capella
—Length4665 mm
—Width1965 mm
—Height1510 mm
1700 KgWeight1320 Kg
—Wheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…