2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 2.5 i (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Mazda Capella vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5i (235 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Capella
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationNissan Cedric
MazdaMakeNissan
CapellaModelCedric
2000Model year1999
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationNissan Cedric
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
200 HPPower235 HP
224 NmTorque274 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption12,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationNissan Cedric
4665 mmLength—
1965 mmWidth—
1510 mmHeight—
1320 KgWeight1700 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Capella and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…