2000 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.5 ST 200 (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Ford Mondeo vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5i (235 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationNissan Cedric
FordMakeNissan
MondeoModelCedric
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationNissan Cedric
7,7 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
231 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
205 HPPower235 HP
234 NmTorque274 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/45 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationNissan Cedric
4556 mmLength—
1751 mmWidth—
1424 mmHeight—
1345 KgWeight1700 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Mondeo and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…