2000 • Ford
Cougar
Ford Cougar 2.5 i V6 24V ST 200 (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Ford Cougar vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5i (235 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Ford Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford CougarSpecificationNissan Cedric
FordMakeNissan
CougarModelCedric
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Ford CougarSpecificationNissan Cedric
7,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
230 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
205 HPPower235 HP
234 NmTorque274 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford CougarSpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford CougarSpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford CougarSpecificationNissan Cedric
4700 mmLength—
1780 mmWidth—
1340 mmHeight—
1390 KgWeight1700 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Cougar and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…