1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5i (235 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
1999 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.5 ST 200 (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Mondeo
NissanMakeFord
CedricModelMondeo
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Mondeo
9,2 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
209 km/hTop speed231 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
235 HPPower205 HP
274 NmTorque234 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption14,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
12,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Mondeo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/45 R17
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Mondeo
—Length4556 mm
—Width1751 mm
—Height1424 mm
1700 KgWeight1345 Kg
—Wheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…