1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5i (235 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
1999 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Ford Cougar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Cougar
Ford Cougar 2.5 i V6 24V ST 200 (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Cougar
NissanMakeFord
CedricModelCougar
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Cougar
9,2 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
209 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
235 HPPower205 HP
274 NmTorque234 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Cougar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption14,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
12,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Cougar
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Cougar
—Length4700 mm
—Width1780 mm
—Height1340 mm
1700 KgWeight1390 Kg
—Wheelbase2705 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Ford Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…