DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Almera vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationBMW Z3
NissanMakeBMW
AlmeraModelZ3
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationBMW Z3
8,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
210 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
143 HPPower118 HP
178 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationBMW Z3
4120 mmLength4050 mm
1690 mmWidth1740 mm
1395 mmHeight1288 mm
1210 KgWeight1220 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Almera and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…