DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Focus vs 2000 Nissan Almera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
FocusModelAlmera
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
170 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
147 HPPower143 HP
202 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4120 mm
1699 mmWidth1690 mm
1430 mmHeight1395 mm
1315 KgWeight1210 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Focus and 2000 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…