DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Nissan Almera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Almera
BMWMakeNissan
Z3ModelAlmera
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Almera
10,4 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
196 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
118 HPPower143 HP
190 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Almera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
11 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Almera
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Almera
4050 mmLength4120 mm
1740 mmWidth1690 mm
1288 mmHeight1395 mm
1220 KgWeight1210 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…