DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 Nissan Almera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeNissan
AlhambraModelAlmera
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
194 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
210 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
14 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4617 mmLength4120 mm
1810 mmWidth1690 mm
1728 mmHeight1395 mm
1754 KgWeight1210 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…