DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 2002 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGAZ
Space RunnerModel31
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
185 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
136 HPPower114 HP
178 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4897 mm
1695 mmWidth1840 mm
1650 mmHeight1472 mm
1300 KgWeight1550 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 2002 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…