DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeMitsubishi
ZSModelSpace Runner
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
19 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
117 HPPower136 HP
160 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4290 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1650 mm
1125 KgWeight1300 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…