DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 GAZ 31 vs 2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeMitsubishi
31ModelSpace Runner
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
155 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
114 HPPower136 HP
255 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption12,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength4290 mm
1840 mmWidth1695 mm
1472 mmHeight1650 mm
1550 KgWeight1300 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 GAZ 31 and 2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…