DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 SsangYong Musso vs 2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeMitsubishi
MussoModelSpace Runner
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
176 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
204 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4290 mm
1864 mmWidth1695 mm
1735 mmHeight1650 mm
1895 KgWeight1300 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 SsangYong Musso and 2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…