DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Toyota Altezza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Altezza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
FTOModelAltezza
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
200 NmTorque216 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/50 R16 VTyre size205/55 R16V
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4400 mm
1735 mmWidth1725 mm
1300 mmHeight1420 mm
1240 KgWeight1360 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Toyota Altezza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Altezza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…