DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan 200 SX vs 1999 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan 200 SX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
200 SXModelFTO
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
265 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55R16Tyre size205/50 R16 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4320 mm
1730 mmWidth1735 mm
1295 mmHeight1300 mm
1350 KgWeight1240 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan 200 SX and 1999 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan 200 SX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…