2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 i TS (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Saab 9-3 vs 1999 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 2.0 i V6 24V GPX (200 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
SaabMakeMitsubishi
9-3ModelFTO
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
3/5Doors2
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
7,3 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
283 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/50 R16Tyre size205/50 R16 V
YesABS—
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
4629 mmLength4320 mm
1711 mmWidth1735 mm
1428 mmHeight1300 mm
1370 KgWeight1240 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Saab 9-3 and 1999 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…