DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Astra vs 1999 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
AstraModelFTO
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
231 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/40 R17Tyre size205/50 R16 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4267 mmLength4320 mm
1709 mmWidth1735 mm
1390 mmHeight1300 mm
1290 KgWeight1240 Kg
2606 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Astra and 1999 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…