DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSaab
FTOModel9-3
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
0 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
200 NmTorque283 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/50 R16 VTyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4629 mm
1735 mmWidth1711 mm
1300 mmHeight1428 mm
1240 KgWeight1370 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…