DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
ChallengerModelLand Cruiser
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

155 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2835 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
140 HPPower152 HP
314 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank90 lt
15 ltUrban consumption18 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size215/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4730 mm
1775 mmWidth1730 mm
1730 mmHeight1860 mm
1850 KgWeight1750 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…