DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMitsubishi
SableModelChallenger
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

190 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
157 HPPower140 HP
251 NmTorque314 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank74 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption15 lt
13 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4530 mm
1850 mmWidth1775 mm
1410 mmHeight1730 mm
1515 KgWeight1850 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Sable and 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…