DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
ChallengerModelChallenger
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

155 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2835 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
314 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank74 lt
15 ltUrban consumption15 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4530 mm
1775 mmWidth1775 mm
1730 mmHeight1730 mm
1850 KgWeight1850 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…