DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
Land CruiserModelChallenger
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

165 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
152 HPPower140 HP
240 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank74 lt
18 ltUrban consumption15 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/80 R16Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4530 mm
1730 mmWidth1775 mm
1860 mmHeight1730 mm
1750 KgWeight1850 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…