DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMercury
ChallengerModelSable
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

155 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2835 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
140 HPPower157 HP
314 NmTorque251 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank68 lt
15 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength5070 mm
1775 mmWidth1850 mm
1730 mmHeight1410 mm
1850 KgWeight1515 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…