DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Isuzu Bighorn Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeIsuzu
ChallengerModelBighorn
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

155 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2835 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
140 HPPower160 HP
314 NmTorque333 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank85 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4750 mm
1775 mmWidth1745 mm
1730 mmHeight1840 mm
1850 KgWeight2080 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Isuzu Bighorn approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…