DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
ASXModelC70
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
198 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque350 Nm
—Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4615 mm
1770 mmWidth1836 mm
1615 mmHeight1400 mm
1510 KgWeight1740 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…