DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C4 vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMitsubishi
C4ModelASX
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4340 mmLength4295 mm
1799 mmWidth1770 mm
1625-1635 mmHeight1615 mm
1430 KgWeight1510 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C4 and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…