2012 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2012Overall Score67.75/100
2012 Volvo C70 vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mitsubishi
ASX
Mitsubishi ASX 1.8 DI-D DOHC MIVEC (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi ASX
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi ASX
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
C70ModelASX
2012Model year2012
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi ASX
10,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
210 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque300 Nm
5Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi ASX
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi ASX
4615 mmLength4295 mm
1836 mmWidth1770 mm
1400 mmHeight1615 mm
1740 KgWeight1510 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo C70 and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…