2012 • Seat
Exeo
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI (143 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
2012 Seat Exeo vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mitsubishi
ASX
Mitsubishi ASX 1.8 DI-D DOHC MIVEC (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi ASX
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ExeoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
SeatMakeMitsubishi
ExeoModelASX
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Seat ExeoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
214 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ExeoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ExeoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ExeoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
4661 mmLength4295 mm
1772 mmWidth1770 mm
1430 mmHeight1615 mm
1430 KgWeight1510 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Seat Exeo and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…